Helicone Review (2026)
An open-source, proxy-based LLM gateway and observability tool - now in maintenance mode after Mintlify acquired it in March 2026. Security and bug fixes only, no roadmap. Not a safe pick for new buyers.
Rating
Starting Price
$79/mo
Free Plan
Yes
SDKs & Frameworks
7
Deployment
4
Best For
Almost nobody new - existing users who need a light open-source logging proxy and understand it's frozen. New buyers should look elsewhere.
Last Updated:
10 Things You Should Know About Helicone
- 1 Acquired by Mintlify on 3 March 2026 and placed in maintenance mode - no roadmap
- 2 Only security patches, bug fixes and new-model support ship now, no new features
- 3 Open source under Apache 2.0 - self-host via Docker or Helm with no license fee
- 4 Proxy mode puts Helicone in the request hot path, a single point of failure
- 5 At acquisition it had processed 14.2T tokens across roughly 16,000 organizations
Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓ Fully open source under Apache 2.0 - you can self-host with no license fee
- ✓ Proxy mode works with any language and provider by just changing the base URL
- ✓ Async SDK logging option avoids adding latency to the hot path
- ✓ Very fast to wire up for basic cost tracking and logging
Cons
- ✕ In maintenance mode since the Mintlify acquisition - security and bug fixes only, no roadmap
- ✕ Mintlify is actively helping customers migrate off, so this is a dead end for new adopters
- ✕ Proxy-in-the-hot-path is a single point of failure - if Helicone is down, your LLM calls fail
- ✕ Adds latency to every call in proxy mode (Helicone cites ~10ms, which compounds for real-time apps)
- ✕ Lightest eval tooling of the major platforms - not a turnkey regression framework
Features
Start here: Helicone is in maintenance mode
Before anything else about the product, the fact that decides it. Mintlify acquired Helicone on 3 March 2026, and Helicone is now in maintenance mode. Only security patches, bug fixes and new-model support ship. No new integrations, no new analytics, no roadmap. Mintlify has said it’s helping existing customers migrate off.
For a new buyer, that’s the whole story. It doesn’t matter how clean the product is if the people who own it are winding it down and pointing you toward the exit. We rate Helicone low for exactly one reason: it’s a dead end for new adopters. Everything below is context for existing users deciding when to leave, not a reason to start.
If you’re evaluating observability tools fresh in mid-2026, this is not the one. Skip to Langfuse or Braintrust.
What Helicone actually is (was)
Helicone is the lightest-weight of the major observability tools - a logging proxy first, with evals a distant second. You point your LLM calls at it, and it logs requests, tracks cost, and gives you a dashboard and an AI gateway that can route across providers.
The defining characteristic is the proxy model. You don’t install an SDK and instrument your code. You change your API base URL to route through Helicone, and it logs everything in the middle. That works with any language and any provider - OpenAI, Anthropic, whatever - with zero code changes. There’s also an async SDK logging mode for Python and JS when you don’t want the proxy in your critical path.
It came out of Y Combinator (W23), founded in 2023 in San Francisco by Justin Torre, Cole Gottdank and Scott Nguyen. By the time Mintlify bought it, it had processed 14.2 trillion tokens across roughly 16,000 organizations. Funding reports conflict - some say a $500K YC seed, others around $5M at a $25M valuation - so treat the exact number as unverified.
Pricing: still published, but the meter is a mystery
The tiers are live, but there’s a real gap in what’s disclosed.
| Tier | Price | Included | Retention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hobby | $0 | 10k requests/mo, 1 GB storage, 1 seat | 7 days |
| Pro | $79/mo | 10k free, then usage-based | 1 month |
| Team | $799/mo | 10k free, then usage-based | 3 months |
| Enterprise | Custom | SAML SSO, on-prem, custom MSA | Custom |
Here’s the catch: the exact per-request overage rate above 10k requests is not published. The page just says “usage-based,” and the $79 Pro price is a floor, not a ceiling. We could not find the actual overage rate from any primary or third-party source, so we’re flagging it as not found. If you’re on Pro at any real volume, you can’t forecast the bill from public information - and now there’s nobody shipping a clearer pricing page.
The free Hobby tier is generous enough for prototyping: 10k requests a month, though only 7-day retention and a single seat.
Self-hosting: free and open, but you’re maintaining a frozen codebase
This is the one genuinely bright spot, with a heavy asterisk.
Helicone is open source under Apache 2.0. You can self-host with Docker or Helm on Kubernetes, no license fee, and the AI gateway is fully open-sourced on GitHub. That’s more open than LangSmith or Braintrust, and on paper it’s a real strength. Earlier Helicone marketing implied self-host was Enterprise-only, but the OSS repo and Apache license contradict that - anyone can run it.
The normal trade-off applies: self-hosting means you own the database, the proxy, ingestion, storage, metadata, the response cache and the scaling path. The subscription savings turn into on-call and infra time.
But the maintenance-mode status changes the calculus. Self-hosting an open-source tool is usually a bet that the upstream project keeps improving and you benefit for free. Here, upstream is frozen. You’d be maintaining a codebase that only gets security and bug fixes, and whose own creator is helping people migrate away. That’s a much weaker bet than it looks.
The architectural gotcha, underneath the acquisition
Even before maintenance mode, the proxy model had a structural cost. Putting Helicone in the request hot path makes it a single point of failure. If Helicone has downtime, your LLM calls fail even when OpenAI and Anthropic are perfectly healthy. And every proxied call carries added latency - Helicone cites around 10ms, but that compounds for real-time apps.
You can dodge both with async SDK logging instead of the proxy, but then you lose the zero-code convenience that was the main reason to pick Helicone in the first place.
Should you use it?
Use Helicone if you’re already on it, you value the lightweight open-source proxy, and you understand you’re now on a frozen product - in which case, use the runway to plan your migration.
Don’t use Helicone if you’re evaluating fresh. The maintenance-mode status makes it a dead end no matter how tidy the tool is, and the vendor itself is pointing customers toward the door.
Bottom line: Helicone was a clean, open, proxy-based observability tool, and in a different timeline it’d be an easy recommendation. But Mintlify put it in maintenance mode in March 2026, and that single fact overrides everything else for a new buyer. If you’re on it, plan your exit. If you’re not, don’t start - go look at Langfuse or Braintrust instead.
Pricing and features verified against helicone.ai on 23 July 2026. This category ships breaking changes monthly - we re-verify every 30 days.
Pricing Plans
Hobby (Free)
$0
- 10,000 requests per month
- 1 GB storage, 1 seat, 1 org
- 7-day retention
- Community support
Pro
$79/mo
- 10k free requests, then usage-based
- Unlimited seats, 1 org
- Alerts, reports, HQL query
- 1-month retention, 7-day trial
Team
$799/mo
- 10k free requests, then usage-based
- SOC-2 and HIPAA
- 5 orgs, dedicated Slack
- 3-month retention
Enterprise
Custom
- SAML SSO and on-prem
- Custom MSA and bulk discounts
- Contact sales
SDKs & Frameworks
Deployment
Eval Methods
Our Verdict
Helicone was a clean, open-source, proxy-based observability tool - but Mintlify acquired it in March 2026 and put it in maintenance mode. Security patches, bug fixes and new-model support still ship, but there's no roadmap and Mintlify is actively helping customers migrate off. That makes it a dead end for new adopters, no matter how tidy the product is. We rate it low purely on that basis. If you're already on it, plan your exit. If you're evaluating it fresh, don't.
Similar Tools
New Relic AI Monitoring
Organisations already standardised on New Relic for APM, logs, Kubernetes and SRE workflows, running relatively low-volume LLM features, who need correlation more than evaluation.
Sentry
Error tracking and front-end debugging, which it does superbly. It is not the right tool for observing or evaluating LLM applications, and should be paired with one rather than substituted for one.
WhyLabs
Almost nobody as a platform. whylogs and LangKit remain defensible as libraries if you specifically need privacy-preserving statistical profiling and are prepared to maintain them yourself.
Literal AI
Nobody. This product is discontinued. Existing users should have migrated already - if you have not, export your data and move to Langfuse or Braintrust.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Helicone still being developed?
No, not in any meaningful sense. Mintlify acquired Helicone on 3 March 2026 and put it in maintenance mode - only security patches, bug fixes and new-model support ship. There are no new integrations, no new analytics, and no roadmap. Mintlify is actively helping existing customers migrate off. For a new adopter this is the single most important fact - it's effectively a dead-end product, and we don't recommend building on it fresh.
Can I self-host Helicone?
Yes. Helicone is open source under Apache 2.0 and you can self-host it with Docker or Helm on Kubernetes with no license fee - the AI gateway is fully open-sourced on GitHub. The trade-off is that you own the whole path - the database, the proxy, ingestion, storage, headers, metadata, response cache and scaling. Given the product is now frozen, self-hosting also means maintaining a codebase that won't get new features.
Does Helicone support OpenTelemetry?
Partly. Helicone's AI Gateway includes OpenTelemetry support for logs, metrics and traces, but integration is primarily proxy-based, and it's less standards-centric than Langfuse or LangSmith. We could not verify the depth of its GenAI semantic-convention compliance against primary docs, so treat that as unconfirmed.
What's the risk with the proxy model?
It's a single point of failure. In proxy mode, Helicone sits in the hot path of every LLM call - you change your base URL to route through it. If Helicone has downtime, your calls fail even when OpenAI or Anthropic are fine. It also adds latency to every request. Helicone cites around 10ms of overhead, but critics note that compounds for real-time apps. The async SDK logging mode avoids both problems, at the cost of the proxy's convenience.
What should I use instead of Helicone?
Given the maintenance-mode status, most teams evaluating fresh should look at Langfuse for open-source observability you can self-host for free, or Braintrust if evals and regression testing are the priority. If you specifically want the lightweight proxy-based logging that Helicone did well, weigh that against the fact that the product is now frozen and its own new owner is helping people leave.
Related Articles
Helicone Pricing in 2026 - Decoded, and Why the Meter Is a Mystery
Helicone's Hobby tier is free and the Pro tier starts at $79/mo, but the overage rate above 10k requests is never published - and the whole product is in maintenance mode. Here is what the pricing actually means and where to go instead.
July 26, 2026
alternatives4 Helicone Alternatives to Migrate To Before It Freezes (2026)
Helicone is in maintenance mode after Mintlify acquired it in March 2026 - security fixes only, no roadmap, and the vendor is helping customers leave. Here are four alternatives, matched to why you were on Helicone in the first place.
July 23, 2026
comparisonLangfuse vs Helicone in 2026 - Why One of These Is a Dead End
Both are open-source LLM observability tools you can self-host for free. But Helicone went into maintenance mode after Mintlify bought it in March 2026, and that decides most of this comparison. Here is the honest split, by use case.
July 26, 2026
comparisonLangfuse vs Helicone vs Opik in 2026 - And Why One Is Off the Table
Three open-source observability tools compared. Langfuse is the MIT default, Opik is the cheapest cloud with the most permissive license, and Helicone is in maintenance mode after its acquisition. Here is the honest pick.
July 26, 2026
comparisonLangSmith vs Helicone in 2026 - Neither Is the Obvious Answer
LangSmith is turnkey for LangChain but closed and expensive at scale. Helicone was the open, cheap proxy - but it is in maintenance mode after Mintlify bought it. Here is the honest comparison, and the tool most teams should actually pick.
July 26, 2026
comparisonOpik vs Helicone in 2026 - One Is Growing, One Is Winding Down
Helicone was a clean open-source proxy - but Mintlify put it in maintenance mode in March 2026. Opik is the fastest-growing open-source observability project and the cheapest managed cloud at $19/mo. Here is the honest comparison.
July 26, 2026
comparisonPortkey vs Helicone in 2026 - Why This Comparison Already Has a Winner
Portkey and Helicone both sit in front of your LLM calls as a proxy, but one is a thriving gateway and the other went into maintenance mode in March 2026. Here is the honest head-to-head, plus where Langfuse fits.
July 26, 2026
best-ofThe Cheapest LLM Observability Tools in 2026, Ranked by Real Cost
The three lowest-cost ways to get production LLM tracing - the cheapest managed cloud, the cheapest self-host, and the free tier that looks great until you read the fine print. Priced at the tiers you will actually hit.
July 26, 2026
best-ofThe Best Free LLM Observability Tools in 2026, Ranked by What "Free" Actually Buys You
Four LLM observability tools you can run for free - judged on what free really gets you - the self-host license, the free cloud tier, and how much of the real product survives when you stop paying. One tool you should not start on.
July 26, 2026