Langtrace vs Lunary

Both are observability & tracing tools. Here is how they actually differ on price, billing model and deployment.

Langtrace Lunary
Category Observability & Tracing Observability & Tracing
Our rating 3/5 3/5
Starting price Free (not yet monetised) Around $20-30/mo
Billing meter No usage metering event
Free plan Yes Yes
Free self-hosting Yes, free Yes, free
Best for Teams that want OpenTelemetry-native tracing with strong vector database visibility, are comfortable with AGPL on the server, and can tolerate the possibility of a pricing model appearing later. Small teams shipping RAG pipelines or chatbots who want basic tracing working this afternoon, and who will either stay small or self-host before volume becomes expensive.

Our verdict on Langtrace

Langtrace is a well-built OpenTelemetry-native tracing tool with unusually good vector database instrumentation, and right now it costs nothing. Two things stop us rating it higher, and neither is about the product quality. The first is the license - the application is AGPL-3.0 while the SDKs are Apache 2.0, and that split matters. Instrumenting your app is safe; modifying the server and offering it as a service brings copyleft obligations most commercial teams will want legal review on. The second is commercial. The vendor states it is not currently charging for the cloud and will announce when it decides to monetise, and public funding data shows a roughly $5.3M seed raised around 2022. A free cloud with no revenue model and a four-year-old seed round is not a stable planning assumption. Use it, and self-host if it becomes load-bearing.

Full Langtrace review →

Our verdict on Lunary

Lunary is a good starter tool that knows what it is. It is optimised for RAG pipelines and chatbots rather than trying to be a complete AI engineering platform, it is Apache 2.0 and self-hostable, and it is among the fastest things in the category to get running. Radar - which buckets responses against criteria you define - is a genuinely useful idea for spotting patterns that individual traces hide. Two caveats matter. The free tier is 1,000 events per day rather than per month, which is a meaningfully tighter constraint than the headline suggests and will not survive a real chatbot for long. And published pricing is inconsistent across sources in a way we could not resolve, with figures ranging from around $20 to $200 a month depending on where you look. Against Langfuse it is lighter on nearly every axis, and Langfuse is the better default for most teams. Lunary earns its place when speed to first trace matters more than depth.

Full Lunary review →
These two meter differently, so published prices are not comparable. Model both against your own workload →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Langtrace and Lunary?

Langtrace: Teams that want OpenTelemetry-native tracing with strong vector database visibility, are comfortable with AGPL on the server, and can tolerate the possibility of a pricing model appearing later. Lunary: Small teams shipping RAG pipelines or chatbots who want basic tracing working this afternoon, and who will either stay small or self-host before volume becomes expensive. Both sit in Observability & Tracing, so the decision usually comes down to billing model and deployment rather than raw capability.

Which is cheaper, Langtrace or Lunary?

It depends entirely on your workload shape, because they meter differently - Langtrace bills on no usage metering and Lunary bills on event. Published starting prices are Free (not yet monetised) and Around $20-30/mo respectively, but those numbers are not comparable until you apply them to the same traffic. Use our cost calculator to model both against your own request volume and span count.

Can I self-host Langtrace or Lunary?

Langtrace: Yes, free. Lunary: Yes, free. Free self-hosting means no licence fee, not no cost - you still own the infrastructure, upgrades and on-call.