DeepEval Pricing Explained (2026) - What You Actually Pay
DeepEval the framework is free under Apache-2.0. The Confident AI cloud is where the money is, and it has a real 10x cliff from $200/mo Starter to $2,000/mo Team. Here is how the meter works, a worked bill, and cheaper picks.
Published:
DeepEval pricing splits cleanly in two. The framework is free forever under Apache-2.0, and for a lot of teams that is the whole story. The Confident AI cloud is where the money lives, and it has a genuine 10x cliff you should see coming. Let me decode both, walk a worked bill, then point at cheaper picks if the cloud steps sting.
Keep the two products straight. DeepEval is the open-source framework - the closest thing to pytest for LLM apps. You write test cases, assert on metrics, and run deepeval test run in CI. Confident AI is the paid cloud built on top for dataset management, monitoring, reporting and governance. Both DeepEval and the DeepTeam red-teaming framework are Apache-2.0 and usable with zero account.
The pricing model, decoded
The OSS framework is $0. The cloud has four tiers, and the shape is what matters.
| Tier | Price | Spans | Projects | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepEval (OSS) | $0 | n/a | unlimited | Apache-2.0, self-host |
| Free (cloud) | $0 | 1 GB-month | 1 | 5 test runs/week, 2 seats |
| Starter | $200/mo | 5 GB-month | 5 | then $1/GB-month |
| Team | $2,000/mo | 75 GB-month | unlimited | then $1/GB-month |
| Enterprise | Contact sales | unlimited | unlimited | SSO, custom |
The quota unit on the cloud is trace spans measured in GB-month, plus seats and projects. The free cloud tier is stingy - 5 test runs a week is enough to try the UI and nothing more.
The trap is the jump from Starter to Team. It is a straight 10x - $200/mo to $2,000/mo - with no middle tier. Starter gives you 5 GB-month of spans and 5 projects; Team gives you 75 GB-month and unlimited projects plus governance. There is a nuance worth knowing, though - overage on Starter is only $1 per GB-month, so if what you are outgrowing is span volume, you can often stay on Starter and pay overages rather than leap to $2,000. The real reason to jump is if you need unlimited projects or team governance, not raw usage. An annual discount exists per the vendor, but the exact percentage is not published.
Estimate your bill
Three cases, plus the hidden cost.
Framework only. $0. You run DeepEval in CI, judge locally, and never open the cloud. This is where most teams should start.
Small team on Starter. $200/mo gets you unlimited seats, 5 projects and 5 GB-month of spans. Say you use 12 GB-month - that is 5 included plus 7 extra at $1/GB-month, so $207/mo. Still on Starter, still cheap. The $200 is more a platform-access floor than a usage ceiling.
Team that needs governance. Once you need more than 5 projects or role-based governance, you are on Team at $2,000/mo. That is the cliff, and it is real - budget for the step, because nothing catches you between $200 and $2,000.
The hidden cost. Nearly every DeepEval metric is LLM-as-judge, so every test case fires another LLM inference. A big suite racks up API bills that have nothing to do with the Confident AI subscription, and runs take minutes not seconds. That cost is easy to forget and easy to underestimate. Cost-model the judge calls separately before you scale.
Cheaper alternatives if the cloud cliff hurts
If the $200-to-$2,000 gap is a problem, or you want the cloud UI without Confident AI’s steps, two options fill the space.
Braintrust is the other eval-first platform, and its Pro tier at $249/mo sits right in the gap DeepEval leaves empty. It is the most turnkey regression-testing tool - autoevals scorers out of the box, and CI/CD quality gates that block a merge on a statistically significant regression, with no per-seat charge. The catch is its own meter - it bills “processed data” in GB counting every byte, with no hard spending cap, so verbose agents can blow past $249. Set billing alerts on day one. Full decode in Braintrust pricing.
Langfuse is the cheapest path if observability plus evals is the goal rather than pytest-style testing. It is MIT-licensed and self-hosts free, or $29/mo managed, and at 1M events a month it runs about $101/mo. You assemble more of the regression orchestration yourself than with DeepEval or Braintrust, but the cost is a fraction. See Langfuse pricing.
So which one?
- Your team writes Python and thinks in tests - DeepEval, living in the free Apache-2.0 framework as long as you can, with the judge-call API cost modelled up front.
- You want turnkey regression testing without the 10x cloud cliff - Braintrust at $249/mo, billing alerts on from day one.
- You want the cheapest self-hostable observability plus evals - Langfuse.
For the wider field, see DeepEval alternatives and the three-way DeepEval vs Promptfoo vs Braintrust. Every price here was read from confident-ai.com on 26 July 2026. This category ships breaking changes monthly, so we re-verify every 30 days.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is DeepEval free?
The framework is, completely. DeepEval is Apache-2.0 open source and fully usable standalone with no Confident AI account - you write test cases and run "deepeval test run" locally or in CI. DeepTeam, the red-teaming framework from the same company, is also Apache-2.0. Confident AI is the optional paid cloud that adds a UI, dataset management, monitoring and collaboration. For many teams the free framework is all they need.
What is the Confident AI pricing cliff?
The cloud tiers go Free, then Starter at $200/mo, then Team at $2,000/mo - a 10x jump with nothing in between. Starter gives you 5 GB-month of trace spans and 5 projects; Team gives you 75 GB-month and unlimited projects. Overage on both is $1 per GB-month, so many teams can stay on Starter with overages rather than jumping - but if you need unlimited projects or governance, the next rung is expensive.
Why do DeepEval evals get expensive to run?
Nearly all of its metrics are LLM-as-judge, including the widely-cited G-Eval. Every test case fires another LLM inference, so a large suite compounds into significant API bills, and runs take minutes rather than seconds - CI/CD needs explicit timeouts. That API cost is separate from the Confident AI subscription and is easy to underestimate. Cost-model the judge calls before you scale the suite.
Is the free Confident AI cloud tier usable?
Barely, for real work. The free cloud tier gives you 2 seats, 1 project and 1 GB-month of trace spans, but it is capped at 5 test runs per week. That is fine for kicking the tires, not for a working team running evals in CI. The OSS framework, by contrast, is unlimited and free - so most teams live there until they specifically need the cloud UI and monitoring.
Explore More
Related Articles
- What Are LLM Evals? A Plain-English 2026 Guide
- What Is LLM-as-a-Judge? How AI Grades AI Output in 2026
- What Is LLM Evaluation? How to Measure AI Output Quality in 2026
- How to Evaluate AutoGen Agents in 2026 - Multi-Turn Runs, Loop Convergence and Termination
- How to Evaluate CrewAI Agents in 2026 - Task Completion, Handoffs and Per-Agent Scoring
Free Newsletter
Get the LLM Evals Newsletter
Platform comparisons, pricing changes and eval technique deep-dives. No spam.
Related Articles
Evaluation of LLM Applications: A Practical 2026 Guide
A vendor-neutral guide to evaluation of LLM applications: metric selection, dataset sizing math, judge calibration, cost models and a tool comparison.
August 9, 2026
guideBLEU vs ROUGE vs BERTScore - Which to Use and Why All Three Fail on Chat
BLEU counts precision, ROUGE counts recall, BERTScore compares embeddings. Here is how each one actually computes a score, a worked example on the same sentence, and why none of them can grade an open-ended LLM answer.
July 28, 2026
guideContext Precision vs Recall Explained - Diagnosing RAG Retrieval in 2026
Context precision punishes noise, context recall punishes gaps. Here is how each retrieval metric is computed, a worked example, and how the two scores together tell you whether your retriever is over-fetching or missing documents.
July 28, 2026
Confident AI (DeepEval) Review
Braintrust Review
Langfuse Review